State v. Arbaugh
West Virginia Supreme Court
1DissentDavis, J.
Justice MAYNARD.
The majority finds that the circuit court abused its discretion in denying Mr. Ar-baugh’s Rule 35(b) motion for another probation period. To do so, the majority eviscerates the law to effectuate its own personal view of a proper outcome in this case. This is a dangerous precedent. I dissent because “[i]t is the unpopular or beleaguered individual — not the [individual] in power — -who has the greatest stake in the integrity of the law.” Florida Dep’t of Health and Rehab. Serv. v. Florida Nursing Home Ass’n, 450 U.S. 147, 154, 101 S.Ct. 1032, 1036-37, 67 L.Ed.2d 132, 139 (per…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- State v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Florida Nursing Home Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.