Legal Opinion

State v. Raudebaugh

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1993No. 19551PublishedCited by 187 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a criminal case in which the defendant was convicted of second-degree murder and use of a deadly weapon in the commission of the murder. In affirming the convictions, we hold:

1. The trial court properly instructed the jury that it could not consider a lesser included offense unless it first acquitted the defendant of each greater offense. We conclude this acquittal first requirement conforms with I.C. § 19-2132(c) and does not violate the United States Constitution.

2. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing a witness for the state to testify…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. FodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. CardIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by187 opinions

  1. State v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. FieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Myers v. Workmen's Auto InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API