Legal Opinion

State v. Partain

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 13, 2009No. 03P3038, A132336PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

In this criminal case, defendant was originally sentenced to a total term of 420 months in prison for 12 convictions. Defendant appealed. We vacated his sentence and remanded the case because the trial court had denied defendant eligibility for sentence-reduction programs on some of the convictions without making the findings required by ORS 137.750. On remand, the trial court imposed a total term of 600 months in prison. Defendant again appeals, arguing that the court lacked áuthority to impose a more severe sentence on remand. We remand for resentencing.

The pertinent facts are entirely…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. ShumwayOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. LangdonOregon Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PartainOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. PartainOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API