Legal Opinion

State v. Worth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 16, 2019No. A165894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

138 Argued and submitted January 17, affirmed October 16, 2019 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOSEPH WORTH, JR., Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 060532697; A165894

452 P3d 1041

This case is before the Court of Appeals for a third time. When defendant filed his initial notice of appeal, no harsher sentence could be imposed on remand than that initially imposed at trial, pursuant to State v. Turner, 247 Or 301,

429 P2d 565

(1967). Defendant’s appeal was successful, and the Court of Appeals remanded the case for a new trial. While defendant awaited his remanded trial,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  4. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NewkirkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. State v. LasheskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API