State v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
This case concerns the scope of the trial court’s authority to impose restitution on remand after defendant had successfully challenged the trial court’s earlier imposition of compensatory fines in a lesser amount. Defendant argues that the trial court’s imposition, on remand, of restitution in an amount greater than the compensatory fine impermissibly burdened defendant’s statutory right to appeal. We affirm.
The procedural facts are undisputed. Defendant was convicted of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427, and third-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.415. The trial court sentenced defendant to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. PartainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. TippettsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. PartainOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. PartainOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.