Legal Opinion

Estate of Picard v. Libby

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 6, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, C. J.

This is an action under the Death Statute, so-called, arising from the death of a child four years of age. R. S., C. 165, Secs. 9, 10. The case is before us on exceptions first, to the allowance of the filing of an amendment and second, to the overruling of a special demurrer.

First Exception

At the February Term 1956 of the Kennebec Superior Court the plaintiff, administrator of the child’s estate, filed a motion to amend his writ by adding two counts. The presiding justice at the same term entered the following order: “Motion granted. Amendment allowed.” On the second day of the April Term…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. W. H. Hinman Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
  2. Hammond v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street RailwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
  3. Danforth v. EmmonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
  4. Curran v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  5. Carrier v. BornsteinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Milton v. Cary Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  2. Dolan v. DolanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  3. Buzynski v. County of KnoxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
  4. Dolan v. DolanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  5. Milton v. Cary Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API