Carrier v. Bornstein
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.
This action was brought under the authority of the death statute, which creates a right of action where at common law there was none. R. S., Chap. 101, Secs. 9, 10, as amended by P. L. 1933, Chap. 113; McKay v. Dredging Company, 92 Me., 454, 43 A., 29; Anderson v. Wetter, 103 Me., 257, 69 A., 105; Danforth v. Emmons, 124 Me., 156, 126 A., 821; Field v. Webber, 132 Me., 236, 169 A., 732. The plaintiff administrator gained the verdict. Defendant moves for a new trial, assigning general grounds. As regards liability, he, however, concedes that the jury finding is not disturbable. His sole urge…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Welch v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
- McKay v. New England Dredging Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
- Field v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
- Anderson v. WetterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
- Danforth v. EmmonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re the Complaint of Sincere Navigation Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971
- Miller v. SzelenyiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Mitchell v. BuchheitSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Carter v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Milton v. Cary Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.