Legal Opinion

Carrier v. Bornstein

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 13, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.

This action was brought under the authority of the death statute, which creates a right of action where at common law there was none. R. S., Chap. 101, Secs. 9, 10, as amended by P. L. 1933, Chap. 113; McKay v. Dredging Company, 92 Me., 454, 43 A., 29; Anderson v. Wetter, 103 Me., 257, 69 A., 105; Danforth v. Emmons, 124 Me., 156, 126 A., 821; Field v. Webber, 132 Me., 236, 169 A., 732. The plaintiff administrator gained the verdict. Defendant moves for a new trial, assigning general grounds. As regards liability, he, however, concedes that the jury finding is not disturbable. His sole urge…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Welch v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
  2. McKay v. New England Dredging Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
  3. Field v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  4. Anderson v. WetterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
  5. Danforth v. EmmonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re the Complaint of Sincere Navigation Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971
  2. Miller v. SzelenyiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  3. Mitchell v. BuchheitSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  4. Carter v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  5. Milton v. Cary Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API