Legal Opinion
Danforth v. Emmons
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 8, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorrill, J.
These actions are based upon R. S., Chap. 92, Secs. 9 and 10; they arise out of the same sad occurrence, and are prosecuted for the benefit of the same persons, Henry M. Goodall, James L. Goodall, Kenneth L. Goodall and Dora M. Goodall, brothers and sister of the decedent in the first action, and minor children of the decedent in the second action.
The essential facts are not in dispute. The defendant is a licensed ferryman, operating a ferry across the Kennebec River between Dresden and Richmond. In the early afternoon of August 8, 1923, James R. Goodall, father of Leonard E., the decedent in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Chicago v. MajorIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- Wymore v. Mahaska CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Kokesh v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- McKay v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Hines v. McCullersMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lindley v. SinkIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Lucas v. Mississippi Housing Authority No. 8Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Parker v. HohmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
- Field v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
- Chase v. Inhabitants of LitchfieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.