Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. W. H. Hinman Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 9, 1950PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNulty, J.

This case comes before this court on exceptions by the plaintiffs to the sustaining of a special demurrer setting forth several causes of demurrer filed by the defendant. The declaration contains three counts. The first count alleges that the plaintiffs on or about the first day of December, 1946, owned real estate and a dwelling house in Bath, Maine, in close proximity to U. S. Highway No. 1, a public highway on which the defendant was engaged in public construction work; that in the course of said construction work the defendant, through its servants and agents, blasted rock formations and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Losee v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Salisbury v. HerchenroderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Wilson v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Ball v. NyeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Chaisson v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Whitman Hotel Corporation v. Elliott & Watrous Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Whitney v. Ralph Myers Contracting CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Bedell Et Ux. v. GoulterOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hanlin Group, Inc. v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1990
  5. Cratty v. Samuel Aceto & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API