Legal Opinion

Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. Hunt

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 2009No. S163577PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Civil Code section 17191 permits a payee seeking to recover on a dishonored check to collect a service charge, or treble the amount of the dishonored check if certain statutory requirements are met. Section 3287 governs the award of prejudgment interest on damages. We granted a request by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.548) to decide a question of California law: whether a debt collector recovering on a dishonored check may recover both a service charge under section 1719 and prejudgment interest under section 3287.

We…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Travis Gonzales v. Carmax Auto Superstores, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. People v. PruntyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Lee v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2012

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API