Legal Opinion
Sacramentans for Fair Planning v. City of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided July 3, 2019No. C086182PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, Acting P. J.
*704Plaintiff Sacramentans for Fair Planning contends the City of Sacramento violated zoning law and the California Environmental Quality Act ( Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq. (CEQA)) when it approved entitlements for real party 2500 J Owners, LLC, to construct a high-rise condominium building in the City's Midtown area. The project was not consistent with the general plan and zoning code standards for building intensity and height. But the City approved it pursuant to a general plan policy authorizing more intense development than zoning otherwise allowed if the project provided a…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Discovery Builders v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Golden Door Properties, LLC v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Lion Raisins v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Martis Camp Community Assn. v. County of PlacerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Napa Valley Unified School Dist. v. State Bd. of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.