Legal Opinion
United States v. Raphael
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 5, 1992No. S2 90 Cr. 450 (RWS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Alan Raphael (“Raphael”) has moved to dismiss the second superseding indictment (the “Indictment") filed against him on grounds that it is barred by the Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy clause and that the Government has used the Grand Jury improperly. In the alternative, Raphael seeks an order limiting the Government’s use of evidence obtained in recent Grand Jury proceedings and an order quashing subpoenas issued to defense witnesses. Raphael also has moved for an order directing the Government to provide him with discovery and a bill of particulars.
Fo…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Various Grand Jury SubpoenasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- United States v. OhleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- United States v. FurrowDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
- United States v. Bin LadenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.