Legal Opinion

United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 22, 1991No. 89-1436PublishedCited by 287 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the Court. †

This case requires the Court to decide what standards apply when a party seeks to avoid compliance with a subpoena duces tecum issued in connection with a grand jury investigation.

I

Since 1986, a federal grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Virginia has been investigating allegations of interstate transportation of obscene materials. In early 1988, the grand jury issued a series of subpoenas to three companies — Model Magazine Distributors, Inc. (Model), R. Enterprises, Inc., and MFR Court Street Books, Inc. (MFR). Model is a New York distributor…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by287 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. In re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Albert Darruthy v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

282 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API