United States v. Jackson
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
The case comes before the court on several pending and outstanding matters. First, the defendants jointly move to dismiss (Dk. 75) the grand jury indictment arguing the substantive differences between the original and superseding indictments evidence that the government has abused the grand jury process. Second, the defendants jointly move to compel production (Dk. 77) of the entire transcripts of the original and second grand jury investigations leading to the original and superseding indictments. Third, the court rules on the defendants’ outstanding…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Mu'Min v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. GarciaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- United States v. FlemmiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000