Legal Opinion
Reed v. County of Orange
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 10, 2010No. Case SACV 05-01103-CJC(ANx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Margaret Reed and 682 opt-in Plaintiffs (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are Deputy Sheriffs for the Orange County Sheriffs Department (“the County”) who seek to be paid for donning and doffing their uniforms. By order dated February 10, 2010, the Court denied the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment as to their donning and doffing claims. Subsequently, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Bamonte v. City of Mesa, 598 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir.2010), which addressed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lesane v. WinterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Lesane v. WinterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012