Lesane v. Winter
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Anthony Lesane and 19 other Navy police officers bring this collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., alleging that they are entitled to compensation for the time it takes them to don and doff their uniforms, protective gear, and fire*2arms.1 Currently before the Court is [32] Defendant Secretary of the Navy’s (“Navy”) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the Navy’s motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are police officers with the Office of Naval…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Freeman v. Medstar Health Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Alibalogun v. First Coast Security Solutions, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Dinkel v. Medstar Health, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Akpeneye v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Akpeneye v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.