Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. HCA, INC.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Enoch
The narrow question we must decide is whether Texas law recognizes a claim by parents for either battery or negligence because their premature infant, born alive but in distress at only twenty-three weeks of gestation, was provided resuscitative medical treatment by physicians at a hospital without parental consent. The court of appeals, with one justice dissenting, held that neither claim could be maintained as a matter of law because parents have no right to refuse urgently-needed life-sustaining medical treatment for their child unless the child’s condition is “certifiably terminal” under…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Bowen v. American Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Murphy v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- the City of Watauga v. Russell GordonTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- Smalling v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Haynes v. Beceiro, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
- Stewart-Graves v. VaughnWashington Supreme Court · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.