Legal Opinion

Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. HCA, INC.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2003No. 01-0079PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Enoch

The narrow question we must decide is whether Texas law recognizes a claim by parents for either battery or negligence because their premature infant, born alive but in distress at only twenty-three weeks of gestation, was provided resuscitative medical treatment by physicians at a hospital without parental consent. The court of appeals, with one justice dissenting, held that neither claim could be maintained as a matter of law because parents have no right to refuse urgently-needed life-sustaining medical treatment for their child unless the child’s condition is “certifiably terminal” under…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. Bowen v. American Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Murphy v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. the City of Watauga v. Russell GordonTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Smalling v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Haynes v. Beceiro, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
  5. Stewart-Graves v. VaughnWashington Supreme Court · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API