Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Stewart-Graves v. Vaughn

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2007No. 78383-7PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Madsen, J.

This medical malpractice case involves an infant who received 24 minutes of continuous resuscitative medical treatment after being born without a heartbeat. The infant survived but suffers severe and permanent disabilities. Nichole Stewart-Graves and Todd Graves, individually, and as guardians for their son, Liam Stewart-Graves (plaintiffs), filed suit against Dr. Katherine Vaughn, the Vancouver Clinic (her employer), and Southwest Washington Medical Center (defendants), claiming professional negligence and failure to obtain informed consent. The trial court granted defendants’…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gomez v. SauerweinWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Keck v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Gomez v. SauerweinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Young v. SavidgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Young v. SavidgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API