Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Estate of Ingram

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1930No. Docket No. 7039PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNELL, J., pro tem.

Charles B. Ingram died about July 24, 1924, leaving a holographic will which was admitted to probate September 19, 1924. While the word “executor” did not appear in the will, the instrument did contain the following language: “I hereby appoint George W. Adams of the firm of Adams, Adams and Binford my attorney for the purpose of seeing that my desires, requests and bequests are fully carried out, and that the court in consultation with my attorney appoint a competent Trustee to hold Title and distribute my estate as hereinafter set out, and for such other purposes as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. In re the Estate of BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Estate of Dunphy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Whalen v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kandjounzeff v. GardinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. State v. UnderwoodWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  3. O'Mara v. Farmers & Merchants National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Estate of SpiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Wight v. StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API