Legal Opinion
Waggener v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America
District Court, S.D. California
Decided November 6, 2002No. CIV. 02CV0695L(AJB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order [Doc. No. 10]
BATTAGLIA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America moves the Court for a Protective Order precluding Plaintiff Susan Waggener from conducting any discovery outside the administrative record in this ERISA case. Waggener has filed an opposition. Unum Life has filed a reply. This motion is appropriate for submission on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth herein, Unum’s motion is GRANTED IN PART AND…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Susan Defelice v. American International Life Assurance Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Mongeluzo v. Baxter Travenol Long Term Disability Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hancock v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Gonda v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Klund v. High Technology Solutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Medford v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2003
- Frost v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.