Gonda v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
SAMUEL CONTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Now before the Court is a motion for a protective order by Defendants The Perma-nente Medical Group, Inc. (“TPMG") and The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan For Physicians (the “Plan”) (collectively, “Defendants”). ECF No. 45 (“Mot.”). The issue presented by the motion concerns the limits of discovery in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) action where the Court has adopted a de novo standard of review. The motion is fully…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Russann H. Hall v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Ioane John Opeta v. Northwest Airlines Pension Plan for Contract EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Waggener v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2002
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shaw v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Hancock v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Colaco v. ASIC Advantage Simplified Pension PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Chacko v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Clifton v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.