Legal Opinion

Frost v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 9, 2006No. CV 05-02486 JFW SSXPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS AND THIRD PARTIES’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO QUASH SUBPOENAS AS TO AMY HOPKINS, M.D., REGINALD GIVENS, M.D., JOSEPH JARES, III, M.D., KATHERINE DUVALL, M.D., NETWORK MEDICAL REVIEW, AND ELITE PHYSICIANS, LTD. (DOCKET NOS. 16 AND 34)

SEGAL, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an ERISA action seeking the recovery of long term disability benefits under a plan insured by Defendant Met-Life. Plaintiff Sandra Frost (“Plaintiff’), an employee of Wells Fargo Bank, asserts that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Richard Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Mongeluzo v. Baxter Travenol Long Term Disability Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Tremain v. Bell Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Waggener v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chadwick v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API