Legal Opinion
Medford v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 10, 2003No. CV-S-02-0955-JCMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants’ Motion for Stay of Discovery and Motion for an Order Setting Forth a Briefing Schedule Pursuant to Local Rule 16-1(C)(1)(# 11) filed October 10, 2002. The court has considered defendants’ motion, Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Stay of Discovery and Motion for an Order Setting Forth a Briefing Schedule Pursuant to Local (sic) 16.1(C) (# 13), and defendants’ Reply in Support of Motion for Stay of Discovery (# 17). Defendants inadvertently failed to attach the two exhibits referenced in the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Parrino v. FHP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Powell v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Hancock v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Duran v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Dam v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Frost v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006