Application of Karl Folkers
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
The appealed claims of Karl Folkers’ application1 are directed to N-panto-thenyl derivatives of two naturally-occurring amino acids, phenylalanine and his-tidine, and a method of preparing those derivatives by reacting the corresponding P-alanyl-amino acid with pantoyl lactone. While Folkers’ disclosure shows, and he originally claimed, naturally-occurring amino acids in general, only the following four claims remain:
12. The process of preparing N-pantothenyl-dl-phenylalanine which comprises reacting N-(p-alanyl)-dl-phenylalanine with pantoyl lactone.
13. The process of preparing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of Frederick C. FosterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Philip v. Palmquist and James v. ErwinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- In re WenzelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pullman Inc. v. ACF Industries Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Application of Karl FolkersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- In re OwnbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973