Legal Opinion

Application of Karl Folkers

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 13, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7393PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The appealed claims of Karl Folkers’ application1 are directed to N-panto-thenyl derivatives of two naturally-occurring amino acids, phenylalanine and his-tidine, and a method of preparing those derivatives by reacting the corresponding P-alanyl-amino acid with pantoyl lactone. While Folkers’ disclosure shows, and he originally claimed, naturally-occurring amino acids in general, only the following four claims remain:

12. The process of preparing N-pantothenyl-dl-phenylalanine which comprises reacting N-(p-alanyl)-dl-phenylalanine with pantoyl lactone.

13. The process of preparing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Application of Frederick C. FosterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. Application of Philip v. Palmquist and James v. ErwinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. In re WenzelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pullman Inc. v. ACF Industries Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. Application of Karl FolkersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. In re OwnbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API