Application of Frederick C. Foster
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of the claims in appellant’s patent application.1
The invention relates to elastomeric synthetic polymers said to combine the desirable properties of natural Hevea rubber and the presently employed synthetic rubbers. These properties are described in the specification:
“Hevea natural rubber is characterized by excellent tack, especially after milling; thus being ideal for tire building operations. Hevea produces vulcanizates having excellent resilience and low hysteresis properties, high tensile…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Von BramerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- International Tooth Crown Co. v. GaylordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Application of Philip v. Palmquist and James v. ErwinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Bros Incorporated v. Browning Manufacturing Co. And Shovel Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Phillips Petroleum Company v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Continental Can Company Usa, Inc. And Continental Pet Technologies, Inc. v. Monsanto Company, Hoover Universal, Inc. And Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Umc Electronics Company v. The United States, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Structural Rubber Products Company v. Park Rubber Company and International Metals and MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Timely Products Corporation, Raphael J. Costanzo v. Stanley ArronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- In Re James A. Smith and James H. McLaughlin and Sterling Drug, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.