Legal Opinion

In re Ownby

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 26, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 8850Published

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-5 and 8-10 of appellant’s application.1 Claims 6 and 7 have been allowed. We affirm.

The invention relates to a vehicle electrical system having at least two batteries charged by a common generator. One of the batteries is used to start the vehicle engine and is usually referred to in the claims and specification as the “main battery.” The other battery (or batteries) is used to power auxiliary systems and is usually referred to as the “auxiliary battery.”

*1234In one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of Frederick C. FosterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. Application of Sune Bergstrom and Jan SjovallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. First National Bank of Logan v. Walker Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Application of Karl FolkersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API