Legal Opinion
Metzler v. IBP, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 15, 1997No. 96-3258PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
This appeal obliges us to revisit IBP’s violations of the overtime and record keeping provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-216, 217-219 (“FLSA”). In an earlier phase of this litigation the Secretary of Labor sought to require IBP to record and compensate its meat-processing employees for time spent in preliminary and postliminary work activities, specifically, in picking up, putting on, taking off, cleaning, and dropping off or storing required safety and sanitary equipment before and after their regular shifts. The litigation focused on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Troester v. Starbucks CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Landry v. Swire Oilfield Services, L.L.C.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Dimas Lopez v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Bustillos v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Baker v. Barnard Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.