Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. West Sacramento Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1922No. Sac. No. 2966PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

In its final form this action is one to recover from the defendant landlord an amount claimed to he due the plaintiff tenant under the terms of the lease upon the termination on November 2, 1917, of the lease wherein the landlord let to the tenant 403.4 acres of land for three years from November 1, 1916, to and including October 31, 1919, at a gross rental of $16,740.75, to be used for the planting and raising of alfalfa. The landlord admits an indebtedness of $2,955.52 and tendered that amount. The tenant claims $20,451.75 as the proper amount. The jury returned a verdict for $13,625 and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Barnard v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Chambers v. RingstaffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. In Re Estate of DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Levy v. GadsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  5. Vulcan Iron Works Co. v. Electro Magnetic Gold Mining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Ralph W. Caton D/B/A Caton Sales Company v. Leach CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. Clark v. LesherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API