Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Shea

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 25, 2002PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Kenneth and Stephen Shea appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Mead, C.J.) interpreting an easement deed in favor of Patrick Jordan and granting Jordan and Eberhardt Duschek an easement by necessity over the Stabawl Road in Hancock. The Sheas argue that the Superior Court erred in: (1) reforming the easement deed when an action for reformation was not pled; (2) finding that Jordan did not have the right to use the “woods road” by prescription; and (3) finding an easement by necessity over Stabawl Road. We affirm in part and vacate in part.

I. CASE HISTORY

[¶…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Forrest Associates v. Passamaquoddy TribeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Glidden v. BeldenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Bernier v. Merrill Air EngineersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. Inniss v. Methot Buick-Opel, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lyons v. Baptist School of Christian TrainingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  2. Weeks v. KrysaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. D'Angelo v. McNuttSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  4. Matteson v. BatchelderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  5. Beverly A. Gravison v. Calvert M. FisherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API