Legal Opinion
Inniss v. Methot Buick-Opel, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 5, 1986PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
Kathleen Inniss appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court, York County, directing a verdict for the defendant Methot Buick-Opel, Inc. (Methot) on Count VI of her complaint, alleging that Methot violated the Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA), 5 M.R.S.A. §§ 206-214 (1979 & Supp.1985-1986), in the sale of a car to her. She also contends that the court erred in granting Methot a recoupment that reduced the jury award of damages to her on Counts I and III of her complaint, pursuant to 11 M.R. S.A. §§ 2-608, 2-711(1) (1964). 1 Methot cross-appeals, contending that the jury…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Zabriskie Chevrolet, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Zweck v. D P Way Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- McCullough v. Bill Swad Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Banville v. HuckinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bard v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Binette v. Dyer Library Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- True v. LadnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Bank of the West v. KlineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.