Legal Opinion
Glidden v. Belden
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 4, 1996PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Justice.
The plaintiffs Mahlon H. Glidden (“Mahlon Sr.”) and Mahlon S. Glidden (“Biff’) appeal from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Pierson, J.) holding that: (1) the Rangeway was abandoned and ownership to the center line thereof reverted to defendants Stevan and Cheryl Bel-den; (2) the Gliddens do not have a prescriptive easement over the Woods Road; (3) they are liable for treble damages to the Beldens in the amount of $18,000 for willful trespass on the Woods Road, and liable for damages in the amount of $5,000 for trespass on a portion of the former…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Dartnell v. BidwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
- Blackmer v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Town of Manchester v. Augusta Country ClubSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. NavcoSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Flaherty v. MutherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Eaton v. Town of WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Striefel v. Charles-Keyt-Leaman PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Ezell v. LawlessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.