Kiamichie Church and Janella Church v. Windrop Ingersoll and Frances W. Ingersoll, (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
The sole question on this appeal .is whether one Walter Kimberlern was acting in the scope of his employment as an agent of the appellees when he was involved in an automobile accident, resulting in injuries to the appellants.
The question is presented under undisputed facts to the effect that Kimber-lem was employed by appellees as a ranch hand on an hourly basis. He lived about ten miles from the appellees’ ranch and did not enter upon his duties until he reached the ranch. Appellees did not undertake to provide transportation to and from Kimberlem’s home, and exercised…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- R. J. Allison, Inc. v. BolingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- State v. FitchNevada Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Convenience Stores, Inc. v. FantauzziNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Usrey v. Dr. Pepper Bottling CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Ross v. Marberry & CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Short v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1965
- McCollar v. EulerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.