Legal Opinion

Short v. United States

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 21, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 2864PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs seek to hold the United States liable for injuries allegedly caused by Glenn Thornton, a Petty Officer in the United States Navy. They claim that Thornton was acting within the scope of his employment when a car driven by him was involved in an accident which caused injury to plaintiff, Diane Short.

In order for the United States to be held liable for the torts of its employees under principles of vicarious liability, the employee must have been acting within the scope of his employment when the tort was committed. See 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Wilson v. Steel Tank & Pipe Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Kiamichie Church and Janella Church v. Windrop Ingersoll and Frances W. Ingersoll, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. National Convenience Stores, Inc. v. FantauzziNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. RobertsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Kornton v. Conrad, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Fitzpatrick v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API