Legal Opinion

Piper v. Somerville

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1933No. Docket No. 653PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

The parties to this action are Indians. They lived together on respondent’s farm in Inyo County in the relation of husband and wife without the formality of a marriage ceremony for a period of thirty years. During that entire time appellant acted as the business adviser of respondent and managed all her business affairs. From the manner in which they gave their testimony, and from their letters in the record, it would appear that appellant was much better educated than respondent. He was a deputy sheriff of Inyo County, the local representative of the Indian board and had read some law.

In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gjurich v. FiegCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Quimby v. LyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Dunham v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Gatje v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Fieg v. GjurichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Krug v. MeehamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API