Legal Opinion
Dunham v. McDonald
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 3, 1917No. Civ. No. 1827PublishedCited by 15 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Appeal from an affirmative judgment entered in favor of defendant. Plaintiff brought this action to recover moneys which he alleged remained in the hands of defendant and to which plaintiff was entitled. On the eighteenth day of August, 1910, pursuant to negotiations theretofore had, defendant addressed a letter to the plaintiff at Santa Paula, California, in the following terms:
“I hereby confirm my verbal agreement with you as follows: In case I accept the lease on certain ground owned by G. W. Faulkner and contracted for in that certain lease and. agreement dated August 13th, 1910, I have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- National Bank of California v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Pierce v. WhitingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Coulthurst v. CoulthurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Quimby v. LyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by15 opinions
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bullard v. BullardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Milstein v. SartainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Mitchell v. California-Pacific Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- American Oil Service, Inc. v. Hope Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.