Legal Opinion

Fieg v. Gjurich

California Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1912No. Sac. No. 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

This action was brought by Fanny Fieg for the setting aside of a conveyance of real property on the ground of fraud. The court gave judgment ip her favor. From it defendant appeals and also prosecutes an appeal from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The findings, which are amply supported by the evidence, are to the effect that for ten years prior to the delivery of the deed from plaintiff to defendant, the parties to this action, although unmarried, had cohabited and lived together on the premises owned by the plaintiff, as husband and wife; that they had there conducted a saloon,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hills v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Sexey v. AdkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gjurich v. FiegCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Patterson v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Holmes v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Piper v. SomervilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Anderson v. TorreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API