Legal Opinion

Edsa/Cloward, L.L.C. v. Klibanoff

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 1, 2005No. 20040695-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*648OPINION

BENCH, Associate Presiding Judge:

¶1 Plaintiff EDSA/CLOWARD (EDSA) appeals an order granting a summary judgment motion in favor of Defendant Daniel Klibanoff. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 From October 2000 through June 2002, EDSA provided services and materials worth $555,432.46 for a thirteen acre planned development (the property) located in Midway, Utah. Ken Forrest and Tim Shields, the developer’s managers, initiated the project and intended to develop the property into a private gated luxury condominium resort.

¶3 Forrest and Shields arranged a commercial loan with Defendant Zions First…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. Four Corners Mental Health Center, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Berenda v. LangfordUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kilpatrick v. Wiley, Rein & FieldingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  4. First of Denver Mortgage Investors v. C. N. Zundel & AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Calder Bros. Co. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. EDSA/CLOWARD, LLC v. KlibanoffCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  2. Olsen v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  3. Pentalon Construction, Inc. v. Rymark Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  4. Pentalon Construction, Inc. v. Rymark Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  5. Pentalon Construction, Inc. v. Rymark Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API