Legal Opinion

EDSA/CLOWARD, LLC v. Klibanoff

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 25, 2008No. 20060958-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

1 1 Plaintiff EDSA/Cloward, LLC (EDSA) appeals from the trial court's judgment and order ruling that its mechanic's lien was of a lower priority than Defendant Daniel Kliba-noffs security interest in connection with a luxury condominium project in Midway, Utah (the Project) because EDSA did not commence sufficient on-gite work or deliver any materials on the ground before Klibanoff's interest was recorded on June 15, 2001. EDSA also argues that the trial court erred in deeming Klibanoff the successful party and in awarding him all of his attorney fees and costs even though…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Smith v. Four Corners Mental Health Center, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. A.K. & R. Whipple Plumbing & Heating v. GuyUtah Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. RicheCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  2. PC Crane Service, LLC v. McQueen Masonry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  3. HOLLADAY TOWNE CENTER, LLC v. Brown Family Holdings, LCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  4. Pentalon Construction, Inc. v. Rymark Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  5. Schenk Family Ltd. Partnership v. Northshore Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API