Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pentalon Construction, Inc. v. Rymark Properties, LLC

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 5, 2015No. 20130973-CAPublished

1DissentDavis, Judge

128 I agree with the majority's determination that the district court erred in concluding that work had not commenced as a matter of law. Accordingly, I concur in reversing the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of FDIC. However, I do not agree with the majority that the question of whether work had commenced can be decided as a matter of law under the cireum-stances of this case. Thus, I would affirm the district court's denial of Pentalon's motion for summary judgment on alternative grounds, namely, that disputed issues of material fact precluded summary judgment.

T.29 The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Normandeau v. Hanson Equipment, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Jones v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In the Matter of the Adoption of C.C.L.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Mellor v. Wasatch Crest Mutual InsuranceUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Edsa/Cloward, L.L.C. v. KlibanoffCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API