Legal Opinion

Berenda v. Langford

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1996No. 940370PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

Timothy Berenda, Roger Whitehouse, Anthony Thomas, and American Technology and Equipment Corporation International, Ltd. (“Amtec”), appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Gordon B. Langford and other named and unnamed parties. Amtec, a California corporation, and Berenda, Whitehouse, and Thomas, as individual shareholders and former officers and directors of Amtec (collectively, the “Amtec plaintiffs”), sued Lang-ford, also a shareholder and former officer and director of Amtec, and others, alleging that Langford breached his fiduciary duty to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,975 Michelle K. Tomera, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Arthur T. Galt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,379 Marian W. Short v. Belleville Shoe Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Russell Packard Development, Inc. v. CarsonUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Bistline v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Spears v. WarrUtah Supreme Court · 2002

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API