Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Oregon, Washington Credit & Collection Bureau, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The question presented on this appeal is whether the District Court of Clackamas County, Oregon, exceeded its jurisdiction when it set aside, without motion or hearing, a judgment in favor of defendant and entered one in favor of plaintiff.

Briefly, the facts are: Oregon, Washington Credit & Collection Bureau, Inc., instituted an action in the District Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Clackamas against Burt Mitchell to recover a sum of money alleged to have been due plaintiff from defendant. The allegations of the complaint were denied by defendant and after a hearing, and on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hammock v. Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Sargent v. American Bank & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Galloway v. Brown's LesseeOhio Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Beck v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Clubine v. City of MerrillOregon Supreme Court · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Curly's Dairy, Inc. v. State Department of AgricultureOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Morphet v. MorphetOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Dugger v. LaulessOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Salitan v. DashneyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Bailey v. SteeleOregon Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API