Legal Opinion
Cruzen v. Boise City
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1937No. 6453Published
1Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.
GIVENS, J.
Appellant asks for a rehearing urging:
That the court erred in holding appellant liable by reason of the defalcation of the city clerk, in that such liability, since it exceeded the revenues for the year, not based on a vote of the people, violates section 3, article 8 of the constitution; citing Feil v. City of Coeur d’Alene, 23 Ida. 32, 129 Pac. 643, 43 L. R. A., N. S., 1095, Boise City Dev. Co. v. Boise City, 26 Ida. 347, 143 Pac. 531, Miller v. City of Buhl, 48 Ida. 668, 284 Pac. 843, 72 A. L. R. 682, and Williams v. City of Emmett, 51 Ida. 500, 6 Pac.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Feil v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Ft. Dodge Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of Ft. DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Lotts v. Board of Park CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Miller v. City of BuhlIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.