Miller v. City of Buhl
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, J.
— Buhl is a municipal corporation, a city of the second class. Desirous of owning and operating an electric light and power system of its own, it conceived a plan therefor, the legality of which is for determination in this proceeding. It proposes to construct an electrical distributing system from the proceeds of a bond issue already authorized, and to enter into a contract with Fairbanks, Morse & Co., for the purchase of a fully equipped electric power generating plant and pay the purchase price from a special fund to be supplied from the rates to be collected from the product or service of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Winston v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Feil v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Barnes v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- City of Bowling Green v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Village of Moyie Springs v. Aurora Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Oppenheim v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Garrett v. SwantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Public Institutional Building Authority v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1939
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.