Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Winter

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1894No. 15,177PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; John Hunt, Judge. Action by Abraham Phillips against Fanny M. Winter and others for partition. Judgment for plaintiff and defendants appeal.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff commenced this action to obtain a partition of certain blocks and lots of land situate in the city and county of San Francisco and known as “outside lands.” There were a large number of defendants, all of whom answered, and set out their respective claims to interests in the lands described in the complaint. Among the defendants were the minor heirs and the adult heirs, and the executrices of the will of William Winter, deceased. The minor heirs answered separately by their guardian ad litem, and alleged that said William Winter, at the time of his death, was the owner and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Christy v. Spring Valley Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Christy v. Spring Valley Water-WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Newman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. OsborneOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. JordanUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. BonzaUtah Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API