Legal Opinion
Holbird v. Harris
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 12, 1946No. 32441PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C.J.
On April 5, 1945, E. M. Ferguson executed and delivered to L. B. Holbird, plaintiff in error, a chattel mortgage covering certain oil field equipment to secure the payment of a note. All of the mortgaged articles except two, a “doghouse” and a Halliburton pump, were purchased by mortgagor from mortgagee, and the note represented the purchase price therefor. Alleging default in payment of note, Holbird sued Ferguson in replevin for possession of the mortgaged articles, judgment on note and authority to sell the mortgaged chattels. Ferguson, though summoned, did not plead or appear in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cooper v. FlesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Broyles Et Ux. v. McInteerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Mitchell v. Guaranty State Bank of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- First Bank of Texola v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Taylor v. WoodenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. Universal UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Anderson v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- M-A-C Finance Co. of Tulsa v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Carroll v. National Live Stock Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Commercial Standard Insurance v. Universal UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.