Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Courtney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 1950No. 33722PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neal, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Tulsa county denying plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, a temporary injunction. Plaintiff, T. J. Anderson, commenced this action in the district court of Tulsa county April 10, 1948, against R. T. Courtney, Universal Supply & Machinery Company, a corporation, and J. R. Horrigan Construction Company, a corporation. The Sugar Bowl Dehydrating Company, a corporation, was later made a party defendant. In his petition plaintiff alleged that on or about December 21, 1946, he purchased from the defendant Universal Supply & Machinery Company…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Steele v. . BenhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Leonard v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  3. Anderson v. BrennemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Holbird v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Yank v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Courtright Cattle Co. v. Dolsen Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. Universal UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Commercial Standard Insurance v. Universal UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. Chong v. Young, Deputy SheriffHawaii Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API