Legal Opinion

City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 4, 1991No. C7-90-1373PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

In the mid-1970’s, the City of Willmar employed Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) to recommend and design improvements to the City’s waste water treatment facility. SEH recommended the City replace its trickling filter system with a series of rotating biological contactors (RBC’s) — large cylinders that rotate bacteria into and out of waste water. The City accepted SEH’s recommendation and construction began in 1981. Clow Corpora tion was selected by the general contractor 1 and approved by SEH to manufacture the RBC’s.

Construction on the improvements was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Honeywell, Inc. v. Minnesota Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. 328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API