City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
In the mid-1970’s, the City of Willmar employed Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) to recommend and design improvements to the City’s waste water treatment facility. SEH recommended the City replace its trickling filter system with a series of rotating biological contactors (RBC’s) — large cylinders that rotate bacteria into and out of waste water. The City accepted SEH’s recommendation and construction began in 1981. Clow Corpora tion was selected by the general contractor 1 and approved by SEH to manufacture the RBC’s.
Construction on the improvements was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
- City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Honeywell, Inc. v. Minnesota Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- 328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.