Legal Opinion

North Star State Bank of Roseville v. North Star Bank Minnesota

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 5, 1985No. C7-84-1509, C5-84-1900PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

North Star Bank Minnesota appeals from an order granting a temporary injunction and from an order modifying and clarifying it.

North Star State Bank of Roseville sought a temporary injunction claiming trade name and service mark infringement, unfair competition, and violation of Minnesota’s deceptive trade practices act. In its order of August 2, 1984, as amended on August 3, 1984, the trial court enjoined North Star Bank Minnesota from serving an area previously designated by North Star State Bank of Roseville under the Community Reinvestment Act. The court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Scott v. Mego International, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
  3. OT Industries, Inc. v. OT-tehdas Oy Santasalo-Sohlberg ABCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Edin v. Jostens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Northland Ins. Companies v. BlaylockDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  2. Ecolab, Inc. v. GartlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. DeRosier v. 5931 Business TrustDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  4. Claybourne v. ImslandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Andersen v. Reward Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API