Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Andersen v. Reward Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 24, 1992No. C3-91-2143PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant alleges the trial court erred when it permanently enjoined appellant from using two business names and ordered the Secretary of State to strike the names from the register. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Reward Corporation is a small business specializing in retail marketing and promotion. On April 27, 1989, appellant filed three “requests for reservation of corporate name” with the Secretary of State for three names: “Minnesota Lottery,” “Minnesota Lotto,” and “Pick 5.” 1 Appellant has not incorporated under any of these names, nor has it used the names in any…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- General Mills, Inc. v. Kellogg Company, Kellogg Company v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Aveda Corp. v. Evita Marketing, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Lawyers Title Ins. Co. v. Lawyers Title Ins. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Griesedieck Western Brewery Co. v. Peoples Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arkansas Lottery Commission v. Alpha MarketingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Krueger v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- DeRosier v. 5931 Business TrustDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Andersen v. Reward Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992