Legal Opinion
Lichtefeld-Massaro, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 22, 1989No. 373-86CPublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
HARKINS, Senior Judge.
In its complaint, filed June 12, 1986, Li-chtefeld-Massaro, Inc. (LMI) sought reformation of a contract with UNICOR — Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (FPI) for the expansion and remodeling of a UNICOR factory and warehouse located in Lexington, Kentucky. The reformation requested would increase the contract price by $43,-176.75, the amount LMI had paid to materi-almen for Kentucky state sales tax for material used on the UNICOR project. Jurisdictional issues as to the applicability to plaintiff’s claim of the non-appropriated funds doctrine were…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Russell Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Corman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Champagne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Hydro Engineering, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.